Alright, two photos of the same scene. One is from Fire walk with me and the second( above) is from The Return,so in both we see Laura screaming. Before The Return i've thought thar she saw BOB watching her, but in The Return we can actually understand that she saw Cooper.
So Cooper was there in FWWM? Why he didn't try to save her then? Why all the events after actually happened?
Maybe things are just the way they should be? So after Cooper saves Laura, she is transported by Judy to Jaques house and after that killed? And Carrie Paige is the last part of Laura who understands what happened to her and this is why she screams? Maybe Cooper hasn't changed actually nothing?
Maybe Lynch shows us more details of her death?
Sorry for my poor english skills.
- My thoughts exactly! It would seem as if he was already there in 1989 - apparently, seeing Cooper in the woods is what she was screaming about - so, yeah! Why didn't he lead her away then?
Also, her scream when she dissapears in the wood from Cooper is her scream from train car. That scream hears Log Lady in the Missing pieces. So was she saved? Yes we see first episode of the first season where her body erased, but wasn't that just a trick?
Apparently, when Cooper leads her away he leads her away from Jacques, Leo & Ronette thus preventing her from being murdered in the train car that night - so, her body was not found by Pete - however, something steals her away from Cooper before he brings her "home" - then later on in Odessa, I assume sometime in the future, he finds Carrie Paige and then.....what year is it?
So much earlier stuff was done for one reason, or simply for the hell of it, and presented as though it was done for another reason in The Return. When you have bizarre scenarios and dialogue, you can do whatever the heck you want with it later.
My summary of Twin Peaks is:
- A bunch of really cool stuff happens then Cooper is trapped in the lodge with Bob unleashed.
-Then we get the original Revenge of the Sith (where we see prequel stuff better left to the imagination), but Twin Peaks style but with lots of weird stuff like photos, rings, Leland Palmer's hooker fetish, the Cooper/Bowie scene. Then Laura is happy in a sad kinda way.
-Then a whole bunch, like a super bunch, of really really cool stuff happens. Ultimately, none of it was intended to make sense in any traditional manner. Then Cooper-somebody brings Laura-somebody to the Palmer house and she screams.
Twin Peaks is about the really cool stuff that makes you think and the ambiguity of the lead characters' fates. I believe Twin Peaks is similar to a Rorschack image that reflects what is in each viewer's mind.
The potential continuity error Laura of screaming at Cooper behind James is just one of the infinite details that cannot be explained because I don't believe continuity is necessary in telling this story.
So much earlier stuff was done for one reason, or simply for the hell of it, and presented as though it was done for another reason in The Return. When you have bizarre scenarios and dialogue, you can do whatever the heck you want with it later.
My summary of Twin Peaks is:
- A bunch of really cool stuff happens then Cooper is trapped in the lodge with Bob unleashed.
-Then we get the original Revenge of the Sith (where we see prequel stuff better left to the imagination), but Twin Peaks style but with lots of weird stuff like photos, rings, Leland Palmer's hooker fetish, the Cooper/Bowie scene. Then Laura is happy in a sad kinda way.
-Then a whole bunch, like a super bunch, of really really cool stuff happens. Ultimately, none of it was intended to make sense in any traditional manner. Then Cooper-somebody brings Laura-somebody to the Palmer house and she screams.
Twin Peaks is about the really cool stuff that makes you think and the ambiguity of the lead characters' fates. I believe Twin Peaks is similar to a Rorschack image that reflects what is in each viewer's mind.
The potential continuity error Laura of screaming at Cooper behind James is just one of the infinite details that cannot be explained because I don't believe continuity is necessary in telling this story.
That's why no more theories for me unless they hit me like a truck in the middle of the night. It's exhausting trying to make little details match up when the show is not about continuity. You're on to something here. The patterns are big associative ones. Sherlock Holmes, this ain't--sorry Agent Cooper.
Fire walk with