WELCOME TO TWIN PEAKS | Fanning the fire, one (b)log at a time | And there's always David Lynch in the air...
“Diane... Entering the town of Twin Peaks.”

Twin Peaks & David Lynch Forums

Notifications
Clear all

Three theories debunked in this EP

25 Posts
17 Users
23 Reactions
7,556 Views
(@myn0k)
Posts: 968
Prominent Member
Topic starter
 

Three popular theories were debunked this episode. 

Audrey might not be Richard's mother - it's been confirmed she is. 

Green gloved guy exists in James's head - disproven in this episode. 

Coop wakes up in EP15. Didn't happen. We could be clever and say that the action might have awoken him and we'll see him back as normal keep next week, but we'll be clutching onto straws. 

 

 

 
Posted : 22/08/2017 1:21 am
(@claired)
Posts: 2
New Member
 

technically, that's just two, plus speculation 😉

 
Posted : 22/08/2017 7:06 am
(@mikeh72)
Posts: 124
Estimable Member
 
Posted by: Myn0k

Three popular theories were debunked this episode. 

Green gloved guy exists in James's head - disproven in this episode. 

 

 

Not necessarily true if the scene in the Roadhouse existed in someone's (or in several people's) mind.  Tammy talking about a "tulpa" is very important imo and maybe comes into play here.

 
Posted : 22/08/2017 7:17 am
(@samxtherapy)
Posts: 2250
Noble Member
 

None of them were debunked.

Mr C hasn't given anything away regarding his relationship with Richard.  Unless it's explicitly stated or shown in another unambiguous way, it's not a given that Mr C is Richard's long lost daddy.  For all we know, he may need Richard to get to Audrey for some reason.  She may have something he wants.  Not needs, wants, of course.

Freddie Green Glove could still be a figment of James' imagination.  We may be seeing events as James understands them.  James could have turned into Mega Ninja Man and flattened everyone with his Super Electric Fist Punch.  Not likely, I know but this is Twin Peaks and stranger things have happened.  We need to see Freddie interact with people in a real, meaningful way, not just punch their lights out. Until I see Hawk or Andy, or anyone other than James talking with him, it's ambiguous.

I never expected Coop to wake up and I'll stick me neck out and say most people felt the same.  Want/hope/wish are not the same as is and will.

So there.

 
Posted : 22/08/2017 7:41 am
(@fumiko)
Posts: 316
Reputable Member
 

Honestly the first time I began encountering this "theory" that the emerald-gloved guy was a figment of James' imagination were people on here and on Reddit rushing to squash the supposed "popular theories".  At this point it seems like we're operating in different universes where theories are only created after they are debunked.  An anthropic fanverse, if you will. 

 
Posted : 22/08/2017 7:50 am
(@myn0k)
Posts: 968
Prominent Member
Topic starter
 

I'll eat my hat if James mate is a figment of his imagination. 

Richard comfirmed his mother is Audrey. If he's wrong or lying, I'll eat two hats. 

I admit I can't comment on the Cooper returning in this episode. Technically though, he didn't but we can argue semantics til we're blue in the face 🙂

Edit - just to be clear I'm not a debunker. I'm just trying to note popular theories that seem to be floating around, and logging them off with a "could be" or a "nope". 

 
Posted : 22/08/2017 12:00 pm
(@myn0k)
Posts: 968
Prominent Member
Topic starter
 
Posted by: Mike Harris
Posted by: Myn0k

Three popular theories were debunked this episode. 

Green gloved guy exists in James's head - disproven in this episode. 

 

 

Not necessarily true if the scene in the Roadhouse existed in someone's (or in several people's) mind.  Tammy talking about a "tulpa" is very important imo and maybe comes into play here.

I would counter this is not the case, given we saw scenes in the prison before the James debacle. And also, if it is all a dream - then sigh...

 
Posted : 22/08/2017 12:03 pm
(@matthew_gladney)
Posts: 354
Reputable Member
 
Posted by: SamXTherapy

None of them were debunked.

Mr C hasn't given anything away regarding his relationship with Richard.  Unless it's explicitly stated or shown in another unambiguous way, it's not a given that Mr C is Richard's long lost daddy.  For all we know, he may need Richard to get to Audrey for some reason.  She may have something he wants.  Not needs, wants, of course.

 

Except they didn't say anything about Richard and Mr. C. Myn0k was talking about Audrey being Richard's mother, so I'm not sure why you launched into all of that about Mr. C. LOL

 

 
Posted : 22/08/2017 12:28 pm
(@matthew_gladney)
Posts: 354
Reputable Member
 
Posted by: SamXTherapy

 

Freddie Green Glove could still be a figment of James' imagination.  We may be seeing events as James understands them.  James could have turned into Mega Ninja Man and flattened everyone with his Super Electric Fist Punch.  Not likely, I know but this is Twin Peaks and stranger things have happened.  We need to see Freddie interact with people in a real, meaningful way, not just punch their lights out. Until I see Hawk or Andy, or anyone other than James talking with him, it's ambiguous.

So, Bobby was locking-up an invisible man, and uncuffing James' imaginary friend. And when Chad noticed him, that was still ambiguous.

Look, Freddie Styles is real.

 

 
Posted : 22/08/2017 12:31 pm
(@myn0k)
Posts: 968
Prominent Member
Topic starter
 
Posted by: Matthew Gladney
Posted by: SamXTherapy

 

Freddie Green Glove could still be a figment of James' imagination.  We may be seeing events as James understands them.  James could have turned into Mega Ninja Man and flattened everyone with his Super Electric Fist Punch.  Not likely, I know but this is Twin Peaks and stranger things have happened.  We need to see Freddie interact with people in a real, meaningful way, not just punch their lights out. Until I see Hawk or Andy, or anyone other than James talking with him, it's ambiguous.

So, Bobby was locking-up an invisible man, and uncuffing James' imaginary friend. And when Chad noticed him, that was still ambiguous.

Look, Freddie Styles is real.

 

I agree he has to be real. 

Don't get me wrong - I appreciate anything crazy can happen. But I think it's way more than a longshot that the whole scene (including Naido) is imaginary. 

 
Posted : 22/08/2017 1:07 pm
(@samxtherapy)
Posts: 2250
Noble Member
 

For the record, I don't believe Freddie is imaginary, not after the fight scene.  But all the events don't point to anything, since they could all still be James' delusion. 

 
Posted : 22/08/2017 1:07 pm
(@fullgomenakias)
Posts: 138
Estimable Member
 

1. the prevailing theory was that she is his mother

2. yes, debunked

3. I ll be as technically anal and say that if he is awake in the next episode then he woke up in ep. 15. Im pretty sure he is awake.

 
Posted : 22/08/2017 1:12 pm
(@micasalakota)
Posts: 8
Active Member
 

It looks likely with Dougie recognising the Gordon Cole ref. from Sunset Boulevard, followed by the electrocution, he'll be pretty much back to normal when he does return  which in all fairness could be anytime in the next 3 episodes considering the overall pacing of the show this season. He was shocked in ep.3 and then shocked in ep.15 which fits with the theory of those numbers anyhow. People jumped the gun assuming he'd be back Ep. 15 and Lynch wouldn't drag it out again (wishful thinking folks!) but, lets be honest, the essential reasoning behind the theory re the Mauve Room's fusebox numerics appears to be correct. Though obv. the Good Coopers return is still not 100% confirmed at this point.

I'll be surprised to see him back in the next episode even. Its pure speculation, but I have this distinct feeling Lynch/Frost are gonna drag out seeing the return of Coop until the finale. that last episode title is "What is your name?" too... Ep. 16 will probably focus primarily on Gordon Cole et al and maybe some more Sarah Palmer scenes. Since they weren't in it last week.

My only niggling doubt here is this: Bad Coop has only just (allegedly) texted Diane the "Las Vegas" message in Ep. 15 so theres still some ways to go before that whole storyline catches up to the Diane receiving it a couple of episodes ago (it must be at least 2 or 3 episodes now since she received it?). They've made it absolutely clear to the audience since the last episode though that the narrative timeline has been slightly eschewed so perhaps theres a reason they've only revealed this erratic pattern of timelines/narratives now...

 
Posted : 22/08/2017 3:03 pm
Myn0k reacted
(@myn0k)
Posts: 968
Prominent Member
Topic starter
 
Posted by: micasalakota

It looks likely with Dougie recognising the Gordon Cole ref. from Sunset Boulevard, followed by the electrocution, he'll be pretty much back to normal when he does return  which in all fairness could be anytime in the next 3 episodes considering the overall pacing of the show this season. He was shocked in ep.3 and then shocked in ep.15 which fits with the theory of those numbers anyhow. People jumped the gun assuming he'd be back Ep. 15 and Lynch wouldn't drag it out again (wishful thinking folks!) but, lets be honest, the essential reasoning behind the theory re the Mauve Room's fusebox numerics appears to be correct. Though obv. the Good Coopers return is still not 100% confirmed at this point.

I'll be surprised to see him back in the next episode even. Its pure speculation, but I have this distinct feeling Lynch/Frost are gonna drag out seeing the return of Coop until the finale. that last episode title is "What is your name?" too... Ep. 16 will probably focus primarily on Gordon Cole et al and maybe some more Sarah Palmer scenes. Since they weren't in it last week.

My only niggling doubt here is this: Bad Coop has only just (allegedly) texted Diane the "Las Vegas" message in Ep. 15 so theres still some ways to go before that whole storyline catches up to the Diane receiving it a couple of episodes ago (it must be at least 2 or 3 episodes now since she received it?). They've made it absolutely clear to the audience since the last episode though that the narrative timeline has been slightly eschewed so perhaps theres a reason they've only revealed this erratic pattern of timelines/narratives now...

What's just crossed my mind is that we still don't really know what Mr C wants (what he really, really wants). 

Perhaps the real Coop returning to normal will provide all the details we as an audience need to know. The real Coop may instantly know what he wants, and provide exposition to Cole / Hawk and co.

There's a lot to understand and resolve in three episodes. Or maybe there's not. 

 

 
Posted : 22/08/2017 3:24 pm
(@silentbobni)
Posts: 370
Reputable Member
 
Posted by: kdawg68

Honestly the first time I began encountering this "theory" that the emerald-gloved guy was a figment of James' imagination were people on here and on Reddit rushing to squash the supposed "popular theories".  At this point it seems like we're operating in different universes where theories are only created after they are debunked.  An anthropic fanverse, if you will. 

This is my fault I cause I think I was the first to mention it on here so sorry. I did say on that post I didn't think it was true due to James and Freddie being so absent from the main story until now.

 
Posted : 22/08/2017 3:41 pm
Page 1 / 2
Share:
WELCOME TO TWIN PEAKS | Fanning the fire, one (b)log at a time | And there's always David Lynch in the air...

Log In

Forgot password?

Forgot password?

Enter your account data and we will send you a link to reset your password.


Your password reset link appears to be invalid or expired.

Log in

Privacy Policy

Add to Collection

No Collections

Here you'll find all collections you've created before.

Shopping cart0
There are no products in the cart!
Continue shopping
0