Maybe this is closer to the riddle presented in the original post?
http://welcometotwinpeaks.com/discuss/please-read-basic-rules/twin-peaks-rewatch/#post-32911
wowbobwow,
You insulted all three of the people who chose to post in this thread. You either wanted to enlighten or proclaim your brilliance by creating this thread. Have you accomplished your goal?
Not sure why anyone was "insulted". . . even if they were over sensitive
wow_bob_wow, I am not following you, but I greatly admire your passion.
To put it another way, in suggesting the finale shows the events that the FWWM verse is about.
When this idea is applied, a large portion of the events, and questions all the way back to page 1 of Laura's diary, begin to make sense and link together
Also, given Lynches resume, taking a primary piece of the saga (the verse) and using as template for the finale, is certainly within scope
If you say so.
I think you've created a multi-faceted riddle and if it helps explain things for you, that's fantastic.
I do Data Intelligence Development for a living, and an extremely comfortable one because I am very good at it.
All I did was detect the pattern and followed its logic and reasoning
Whst is probably throwing you off is that it doesn't "answer" typical questions or provide theories or sultions, but suggests approaching the questions , on a different terrain and broader terrian then has been.
What's throwing us off is that so far your multiple attempts at explanations have been gibberish.
If you say so.
I think you've created a multi-faceted riddle and if it helps explain things for you, that's fantastic.
I do Data Intelligence Development for a living, and an extremely comfortable one because I am very good at it.
All I did was detect the pattern and followed its logic and reasoning
Whst is probably throwing you off is that it doesn't "answer" typical questions or provide theories or sultions, but suggests approaching the questions , on a different terrain and broader terrian then has been.
What's throwing us off is that so far your multiple attempts at explanations have been gibberish.
Please, please post a warning before comments like this. I nearly spat my tea all over the screen. ?
If you say so.
I think you've created a multi-faceted riddle and if it helps explain things for you, that's fantastic.
I do Data Intelligence Development for a living, and an extremely comfortable one because I am very good at it.
All I did was detect the pattern and followed its logic and reasoning
Whst is probably throwing you off is that it doesn't "answer" typical questions or provide theories or sultions, but suggests approaching the questions , on a different terrain and broader terrian then has been.
What's throwing us off is that so far your multiple attempts at explanations have been gibberish.
Good one 🙂 I'm looking here all the time and still don't know what his theory mean 🙂
If you say so.
I think you've created a multi-faceted riddle and if it helps explain things for you, that's fantastic.
I do Data Intelligence Development for a living, and an extremely comfortable one because I am very good at it.
All I did was detect the pattern and followed its logic and reasoning
Whst is probably throwing you off is that it doesn't "answer" typical questions or provide theories or sultions, but suggests approaching the questions , on a different terrain and broader terrian then has been.
What's throwing us off is that so far your multiple attempts at explanations have been gibberish.
Please, please post a warning before comments like this. I nearly spat my tea all over the screen. ?
Sorry Sam. 😉
Damn fine splurt!
If you say so.
I think you've created a multi-faceted riddle and if it helps explain things for you, that's fantastic.
I do Data Intelligence Development for a living, and an extremely comfortable one because I am very good at it.
All I did was detect the pattern and followed its logic and reasoning
Whst is probably throwing you off is that it doesn't "answer" typical questions or provide theories or sultions, but suggests approaching the questions , on a different terrain and broader terrian then has been.
What's throwing us off is that so far your multiple attempts at explanations have been gibberish.
While I admit to a level of neglect for thumb accuracy, it's not gibberish in the least.
Regardless, it should be straight forward Twin Peaks fans, who are familiar with Lynch and TP now shouldn't it?
If you say so.
I think you've created a multi-faceted riddle and if it helps explain things for you, that's fantastic.
I do Data Intelligence Development for a living, and an extremely comfortable one because I am very good at it.
All I did was detect the pattern and followed its logic and reasoning
Whst is probably throwing you off is that it doesn't "answer" typical questions or provide theories or sultions, but suggests approaching the questions , on a different terrain and broader terrian then has been.
What's throwing us off is that so far your multiple attempts at explanations have been gibberish.
Always a potential monkeywrench, for sure.
Fire walk with