And I thought I analyzed this stuff pretty thoroughly!!! There's a lot of info there, thanks for the posting.
I'm not sure there's enough evidence to say for certain if there were multiple versions of the same people running around, if that's even possible. If it could happen, it would explain a great many things.
I've only so far read the first bit about Diane. That's some interesting puzzle piecing. It makes sense....in the same way it makes no sense at all. ?
I think we could find a lot of things to piece together like this.
I think we are looking at the timeline inconsistencies again, alternate realities. Once we know that Cooper will go back and "save" Laura, we are pretty sure there now have to be 2 versions of the facts, official and unofficial (I still wonder which one is which).
This also indicates something that makes me very sad. It seems that whichever timeline Cooper decides, somehow it all ends up exactly the same in the end with only the slightest variations in the scenarios. Is it fate, or destiny, or such intrinsic human nature that we are doomed no matter what we do?
And I thought I analyzed this stuff pretty thoroughly!!! There's a lot of info there, thanks for the posting.
I'm not sure there's enough evidence to say for certain if there were multiple versions of the same people running around, if that's even possible. If it could happen, it would explain a great many things.
I didnd't take it to mean multiple versions of the same people running around at the same time, at least when it came to the Diane portion of the story. I see this as evidence for the multiple timeline theory.
I'm not as impressed or excited about the Cooper synopses. I can sort of see where the author is going and that maybe there is a little something to it. But it doesn't seem as smooth as the Synopses with Diane. In other words, it seems like more of a stretch. What do you guys think?
I'm not as impressed or excited about the Cooper synopses. I can sort of see where the author is going and that maybe there is a little something to it. But it doesn't seem as smooth as the Synopses with Diane. In other words, it seems like more of a stretch. What do you guys think?
Yeah, the Diane stuff seems really tight. The Cooper (good Coop) section is less compelling. I find the Mr. C. one very interesting though - in particular the two different ways of presenting Jeffries (one w/ the wall being pulled back like a curtain v holographic). Again, I don't completely agree with all his conclusions, but he def picks up on some interesting stuff. . .
I'm not as impressed or excited about the Cooper synopses. I can sort of see where the author is going and that maybe there is a little something to it. But it doesn't seem as smooth as the Synopses with Diane. In other words, it seems like more of a stretch. What do you guys think?
Yeah, the Diane stuff seems really tight. The Cooper (good Coop) section is less compelling. I find the Mr. C. one very interesting though - in particular the two different ways of presenting Jeffries (one w/ the wall being pulled back like a curtain v holographic). Again, I don't completely agree with all his conclusions, but he def picks up on some interesting stuff. . .
I'm not quite sold on the Mr. C bit either. I think maybe because it doesn't seem as well thought out or written as the Diane piece. The Diane synopsis seems totally plausible to me where the Cooper and the Mr. C bits seem a further stretch or with more holes.
But still worthy of looking into further.
It happens very quickly when we are watching this scene on TV.
But now, I'm asking me how I missed that.
From Reddit too, there is also the first scene in the Sheriff's Office with the strange insurance salesman.
He is asking twice the same sentence "I like to see Sheriff Truman".
But the second time is coming from another take.
(a pen has moved on Lucy's desk, the necktie moved too and a digital fly buzzing between him and Lucy was added).
A fly...
Twin.Peaks_.S03E01.1080p.BluRay.X264-REWARD.mkv_snapshot_00.18.34_2018.06.19_17.30.08.jpg
It happens very quickly when we are watching this scene on TV.
But now, I'm asking me how I missed that.
Yeah, that one has intrigued me for quite some time.
Possibly something that was missed in editing? I'd like to think not though, it would be pretty cool if there's more to this.
Possibly something that was missed in editing? I'd like to think not though, it would be pretty cool if there's more to this.
Which one? Albert & Tammy or the insurance guy and Lucy?
In the 2 Tammy clips we see before this one she is looking down to her right - probably to locate her weapon. I don't think there's anything to puzzle about here.
In the 2 Tammy clips we see before this one she is looking down to her right - probably to locate her weapon. I don't think there's anything to puzzle about here.
There has been much debate about that. She is nowhere in the first shot, so she would have to be doing some serious bending under the table to not be seen at all.
Sure it's possible.....
It happens very quickly when we are watching this scene on TV.
But now, I'm asking me how I missed that.
Wow I also missed this! Thanks!
Fire walk with